Your view of pregnant women is kind of sexist or stereotyped.
> Totally NJC, but speaking of S & M, isn't it pretty
> fascinating the various trappings, accessories, bells and
> whistles we've concocted to accentuate Nature's 2nd or 3rd
> most basic act?
>
> Bondage, domination, leather, rubber, latex, stockings,
> high heels, lingerie of a thousand kinds, etc....
>
> What do any of these things really have to do with the
> procreative act? And why have we come to associate all
> these things with sex?
>
> Not that I'm complaining, mind you, just wondering.
>
> To me, sex is the Ultimate Bait & Switch. Take a pretty
> girl (or hot dude, to be fair) and dress them up in
> stereotypically sexy clothes, mini-skirt, tight jeans,
> half-shirt, etc., throw on some lipstick, eye shadow, curl
> the hair, whatever, and now they become an object of
> sexual desire. Okay fine. But when I'm lusting after a
> hot girl, the LAST thing on my mind is making a baby, even
> though the first thing on my mind, or near to it, is doing
> the baby-making act. And am I thinking about giving her a
> big fat belly and seeing her in baggy sweats with no
> make-up and her hair up in a bun for the next two years?
> No. And yet that is the end result that all these
> trappings of sexuality are ultimately designed to lead to,
> intentionally or no.
>
> I just find the whole thing fucking bizarre.
>
> So anyway, about that Jim Steiman guy....
>
> > Actually, I found a listing for an S&M conference coming
> > up in Cincinnati this spring called Anything for Love.
> >
> > I had to laugh :)
> >
> > Bet you'd get some interesting answers there!
> >
> > > What is your, THAT?!
> > >
> > > I'd Do Anything For Love (But I Won't Fuck THAT) hehehe
|
