HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Serious Feedback

Posted by:
Jacqueline 09:23 pm MST 01/19/07
In reply to: re: Serious Feedback - Pudding 08:59 pm MST 01/19/07

Point taken.

> A few different visual smilies might make some of my posts
> to be read as they were meant to be, and that's
> tongue-in-cheek. That way psychopaths like AGAwesome
> wouldn't be threatening to hunt me down and blow my head
> off like the fucking coward that I am.
>
> Or perhaps we should devise a 'Pudding Test' as I seem to
> have the knack for bringing out the disturbed side of
> certain people...LOL Milton, Wacko, Stephen and now
> AGAwesome.
>
> Pud
>
> > I didn't think emoticons were that important when you can
> > type in :) :( ;) -- but if you guys want them...that
> > request WILL be taken care of. xxx JD
> >
> >
> > > Some basic emoticons would solve a lot of
> > > misinterpretations of some posts. But I doubt it'll ever
> > > happen.
> > >
> > > Pud
> > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > > Do you think we need some basic emoticons on this board?
> > > > A lot of things can be taken out of context in text, and I
> > > > think a few basic smilies would go a long way to making a
> > > > more harmonious board, as I've seen a lot of "fights"
> > > > start from absolutely nothing.
> > > >
> > > > Steve.
> > > >


reply |

Previous: re: Serious Feedback - Pudding 08:59 pm MST 01/19/07
Next: Phort (take two) - sinecurea 07:52 pm MST 01/19/07

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE