| re: Serious Feedback | |
|
Posted by: |
Jacqueline 04:23 am UTC 01/20/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Serious Feedback - Pudding 03:59 am UTC 01/20/07 |
| Point taken. > A few different visual smilies might make some of my posts > to be read as they were meant to be, and that's > tongue-in-cheek. That way psychopaths like AGAwesome > wouldn't be threatening to hunt me down and blow my head > off like the fucking coward that I am. > > Or perhaps we should devise a 'Pudding Test' as I seem to > have the knack for bringing out the disturbed side of > certain people...LOL Milton, Wacko, Stephen and now > AGAwesome. > > Pud > > > I didn't think emoticons were that important when you can > > type in :) :( ;) -- but if you guys want them...that > > request WILL be taken care of. xxx JD > > > > > > > Some basic emoticons would solve a lot of > > > misinterpretations of some posts. But I doubt it'll ever > > > happen. > > > > > > Pud > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > Do you think we need some basic emoticons on this board? > > > > A lot of things can be taken out of context in text, and I > > > > think a few basic smilies would go a long way to making a > > > > more harmonious board, as I've seen a lot of "fights" > > > > start from absolutely nothing. > > > > > > > > Steve. > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Serious Feedback - Pudding 03:59 am UTC 01/20/07 |
| Next: | Phort (take two) - sinecurea 02:52 am UTC 01/20/07 |
| Thread: | |