HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Grammar in "Left in the Dark"

Posted by:
Unno 07:50 pm UTC 01/30/07
In reply to: re: Grammar in "Left in the Dark" - SeeingI 03:11 pm UTC 01/30/07

Actually, most moderns grammarians would accept words like "them," "they," etc. as proper third person singular forms. Prescriptivism is pretty much dead now. Still, I know what you mean. I still mutter "well" under my breath when someone uses good adverbally without a linking verb.

Unno





> If grammar rules truly kept up with spoken language, there
> would be a gender-neutral term for third person. People
> say, "If anyone wants a cookie, they can get it
> themselves" instead of "he or she can get it for him or
> herself." I know which one I and everybody else says, but
> I also know which one is technically "correct."


reply |

Previous: re: Grammar in "Left in the Dark" - SeeingI 03:11 pm UTC 01/30/07
Next: re: Grammar in "Left in the Dark" - SeeingI 01:59 pm UTC 02/02/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE