HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Answering Jim's questions

Posted by:
Smeghead (rockmanREMOVETHIS@realmofdreams.com) 06:32 am MST 01/31/07
In reply to: re: Answering Jim's questions - SeeingI 12:49 pm MST 01/30/07

There is no way to try Bush for war crimes for Abu Grahib since as soon as it was brought to light what was going on they shut it down and locked up the soldiers responsible... And since putting underwear on someone's head and having dogs bark at them and pretending they are holding live wires and laughing at their cocks are hardly war crimes... Is this from the same people who felt Sadam shouldn't have been removed and tried for his war crimes?

> The idea of assassinating Bush with Cheney as Veep is like
> saying "That mean old Darth Vader ought to be killed so
> that nice old Palpatine can take over!"
>
> I think that there is a case for Bush, Cheney & Rumsfeld
> being held for war crimes, mostly relating to Abu Grahib.
> However, I am morally opposed to murder, political or
> otherwise.
>
>
> > No I don't think Bush should be Assassinated or tried for
> > war crimes. He has committed no war crime and I don't
> > believe in assassinating a president who has not commited
> > any type of usurption. Sadam violated the peace treaty he
> > signed during the first gulf war 17 times. America and
> > Brittain under that violation had every legal (and in my
> > opinion moral) right to remove him for that alone... not
> > to mention numerous other reasons...


reply |

Previous: re: Answering Jim's questions - SeeingI 12:49 pm MST 01/30/07
Next: re: Answering Jim's questions - SeeingI 01:32 pm MST 02/01/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE