HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: The Number Three....

Posted by:
Wilbury 04:50 am MST 02/01/07
In reply to: re: The Number Three.... - La_Comtesse 08:23 pm MST 01/31/07

I'm not aactually that keen on circular forms in my numbers. but they're better than "1". Kerning a bunch of "1"s is a pain in the arse.

> I myself think 666 is the most asthetical number, I think
> those three sixes just look beautiful.
>
> That's for non-single numbers, when it comes to single
> numbers my vote still goes to 0.
>
>
>
> > and of course 69 also...
> >
> > > i concur, although 1, 3, 7, 9, 14, 21, 23 and 616 are all
> > > worthy contenders...
> > >
> > > > Eleven, 11, (11:11)
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts or responses?


reply |

Previous: re: The Number Three.... - La_Comtesse 08:23 pm MST 01/31/07
Next: re: The Number Three.... - La_Comtesse 08:12 pm MST 01/30/07

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE