HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Answering Jim's questions

Posted by:
SeeingI 01:32 pm MST 02/01/07
In reply to: re: Answering Jim's questions - Smeghead 06:32 am MST 01/31/07

"As soon as"? That's stretching it. I think there's a case to be made, and the abuse is a lot worse than just underwear on the head. Look at all 200+ photos, they'll make you sick.

As for Saddam Hussein, I supported the war at first and I'm glad he's dead now, for all that has to do with the original point. I just have this nagging feeling that America should at least TRY to live up to its own ideals.



> There is no way to try Bush for war crimes for Abu Grahib
> since as soon as it was brought to light what was going on
> they shut it down and locked up the soldiers
> responsible... And since putting underwear on someone's
> head and having dogs bark at them and pretending they are
> holding live wires and laughing at their cocks are hardly
> war crimes... Is this from the same people who felt Sadam
> shouldn't have been removed and tried for his war crimes?
>
> > The idea of assassinating Bush with Cheney as Veep is like
> > saying "That mean old Darth Vader ought to be killed so
> > that nice old Palpatine can take over!"
> >
> > I think that there is a case for Bush, Cheney & Rumsfeld
> > being held for war crimes, mostly relating to Abu Grahib.
> > However, I am morally opposed to murder, political or
> > otherwise.
> >
> >
> > > No I don't think Bush should be Assassinated or tried for
> > > war crimes. He has committed no war crime and I don't
> > > believe in assassinating a president who has not commited
> > > any type of usurption. Sadam violated the peace treaty he
> > > signed during the first gulf war 17 times. America and
> > > Brittain under that violation had every legal (and in my
> > > opinion moral) right to remove him for that alone... not
> > > to mention numerous other reasons...


reply |

Previous: re: Answering Jim's questions - Smeghead 06:32 am MST 01/31/07
Next: re: Answering Jim's questions - wenners 12:21 pm MST 01/29/07

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE