Well, that said, last year, for example, Meat only got to release "Pigs" and "Heaven" as part of the trademark settlement. He didn't have permission for those, and he probably didn't have permission for Jim's other new stuff aside from that which was already released.
Now that Jim is actively considering the 30th birthday BAT (and he is, or he wouldn't write that he was planning something like that), and Meat actually selected 4 of what we presume are the original BAT III songs, his options menu is a little bigger.
> If that's the case then it just makes me angry that this
> didn't happen last year instead of us being 'treated' to
> gems like Cry Over Me and If God Could Talk.
>
> > We must not forget, however, that according to Jim's blog,
> > he wrote at least nine (9) songs for BAT III, maybe more,
> > so maybe it's really Meat saying that he's going to choose
> > four more from the batch Jim originally gave him.
> >
> > > I don't believe Jim is writing new songs for Meat... Meat
> > > has proven that he has nothing to offer Jim.
> > >
> > > > Meat was on Radio 2 here in the UK yesterday.
> > > > He said that he has four Jim-songs that he wants to do for
> > > > the Bat boxset, and that Jim is writing four more.
> > > > Jim, is this true? Or is Meat back to his usual tricks
> > > > again?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Stephen.
|
