| re: Bat III | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 12:06 pm UTC 05/10/21 |
| In reply to: | Bat III - MasterMoose 03:28 am UTC 05/10/21 |
| Did Jim agree not to say anything public as part of the agreement that ended the lawsuits which gave Jim the right to do a BOOH show and Meat the right to do a BOOH 3 album? I seem to remember that Meat was the first one of the two to start saying anything really negative about BOOH 3. Although I could be wrong and maybe Ryan The Historian could tell us exactly what happened as far as all of that goes. When Jim died, Meat said that he and Jim never sued each other. He said only their managers sued. > I remember based on the blog and messages here that > Steinman had an order not to comment negatively on Bat 3 > (in public) > > Does anyone have his true (candid) opinions on the album? > > Not meaning to be insensitive. But the gossip in me has > always felt that Jim did not do well being gagged. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Bat III - MasterMoose 03:28 am UTC 05/10/21 |
| Next: | re: Bat III - rockfenris2005 01:24 pm UTC 05/10/21 |
| Thread: |
|