| re: One Question Not to Answer | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 03:28 pm UTC 12/28/06 |
| In reply to: | One Question Not to Answer - Rabe 11:08 am UTC 12/28/06 |
| Well, there's "caring" and then there's "curiousity." I'm curious about plenty of things about which I don't really care. In the case of Jim's sexuality, neither applies. I don't care and I'm not even curious. But, my point is I can see why someone might want to know, as one who is interested in all things Steinman, out of simple curiousity, and not so much out of "caring," or having any vested interest in the answer. The lack of tact to actually come out and ask the man, though, is a different story... > The one about Jim's sexuality is one that I think > shouldn't even be asked and I'm glad to see that Jim's not > answering it. > > Why? > > Because what the hell does it matter what sexual > orientation he is? Does that change a single note or word > of one of his songs? > > Not atfuckinall! > > So for all those who are about this - get a damned life! > > Sheesh. > > find something else to care about. Like when the Dream > Engine album is coming out. > > Rabe... | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | One Question Not to Answer - Rabe 11:08 am UTC 12/28/06 |
| Next: | re: One Question Not to Answer - Jaycee 12:23 am UTC 12/29/06 |
| Thread: |
|