HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim blogged

Posted by:
Pudding 11:57 am MST 12/28/06
In reply to: re: Jim blogged - rockfenris2005 03:43 am MST 12/28/06

> Hmm, it almost confirms my theory doesn't it. I know
> you'll say no, but Jim (in that entry) again implies that
> it's a Rinkoff production.

That isn't a theory at all, since numerous different people on the board time and time again, have said it's Rinkoff's baby.

Pud


reply |

Previous: re: Jim blogged - rockfenris2005 03:43 am MST 12/28/06
Next: re: Jim blogged - rockfenris2005 01:35 pm MST 12/28/06

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE