HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim blogged

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 01:35 pm MST 12/28/06
In reply to: re: Jim blogged - Pudding 11:57 am MST 12/28/06



> > Hmm, it almost confirms my theory doesn't it. I know
> > you'll say no, but Jim (in that entry) again implies that
> > it's a Rinkoff production.
>
> That isn't a theory at all, since numerous different
> people on the board time and time again, have said it's
> Rinkoff's baby.
>
> Pud

If numerous people said it, I said it first. My memory on THAT is crystal clear




reply |

Previous: re: Jim blogged - Pudding 11:57 am MST 12/28/06
Next: re: Jim blogged - Pudding 04:47 pm MST 12/28/06

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE