> > Hmm, it almost confirms my theory doesn't it. I know
> > you'll say no, but Jim (in that entry) again implies that
> > it's a Rinkoff production.
> That isn't a theory at all, since numerous different
> people on the board time and time again, have said it's
> Rinkoff's baby.
If numerous people said it, I said it first. My memory on THAT is crystal clear