HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.

Posted by:
Markus 03:42 am MST 12/29/06
In reply to: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Lasse86b 02:43 am MST 12/29/06

Fine. Maybe you can start a thread every day and ask the same question? Oh, you already started it. It won´t bother me I´d only think somethings damn wrong with you.

Markus.

> It really beats me, that theres so much anxiety about
> touching this issue, and a lot of people seem to be
> getting real angry with the curious on the board (esp.
> you, Pudding). It's slightly contradictory when people at
> the same time as claiming that they always see a pure Jim,
> free of sexuality etc. Sort of, the unpolluted Jim. yet
> still I see people shrieking, when the suspicion arises as
> to whether Jim is a NYC liberal or not.
>
> My point is, a lot of people obviously get offended by our
> asking (Jim seems to take it with a pinch of salt tho,
> which is refreshing), but in fact this IS, or should be, a
> free board, so in essence everyone's entitled to ask. If
> know one really knows, well then it ends there. Fine by
> me. But I don't need anyone teaching me what I should be
> asking and when and when not to get a life. Besides THAT,
> I sincerely think that Pudding and others who don't wanna
> know, and for some reason wanna stop us who do dead in our
> tracks, should participate, but you really shouldn't be so
> judgmental. We're just curious.


reply |

Previous: Get over it - Pudding 03:56 am MST 12/29/06
Next: Vampirok Balja update - Pudding 06:24 pm MST 12/28/06

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE