HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

Get over it

Posted by:
Pudding 03:56 am MST 12/29/06
In reply to: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Lasse86b 02:43 am MST 12/29/06

The fact of the matter is, IT'S NOT IMPORTANT which way Jim likes to bat. Despite your neo-homo rantings, Jim isn't going to be your poster boy for homosexuality.

Here's a joke just for you since you're obviously a stressful person.

Construction worker on the 5th floor of a building needed a handsaw. So he spots another worker on the ground floor and yells down to him, but he can't hear him. So the worker on the 5th floor tries sign language. He pointed to his eye meaning "I", pointed to his knee meaning "need", then moved his hand back and forth in a hand saw motion. The man on the ground floor nods his head, pulls down his pants, whips out his chop and starts masturbating. The worker on 5th floor gets so pissed off he runs down to the ground floor and says, "What the fuck is your problem!!! I said I needed a hand saw!". The other guy says, "I knew that! I was just trying to tell you - I'm coming!"

Pud

> It really beats me, that theres so much anxiety about
> touching this issue, and a lot of people seem to be
> getting real angry with the curious on the board (esp.
> you, Pudding). It's slightly contradictory when people at
> the same time as claiming that they always see a pure Jim,
> free of sexuality etc. Sort of, the unpolluted Jim. yet
> still I see people shrieking, when the suspicion arises as
> to whether Jim is a NYC liberal or not.
>
> My point is, a lot of people obviously get offended by our
> asking (Jim seems to take it with a pinch of salt tho,
> which is refreshing), but in fact this IS, or should be, a
> free board, so in essence everyone's entitled to ask. If
> know one really knows, well then it ends there. Fine by
> me. But I don't need anyone teaching me what I should be
> asking and when and when not to get a life. Besides THAT,
> I sincerely think that Pudding and others who don't wanna
> know, and for some reason wanna stop us who do dead in our
> tracks, should participate, but you really shouldn't be so
> judgmental. We're just curious.


reply |

Previous: re: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - wenners 05:16 am MST 12/29/06
Next: re: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Markus 03:42 am MST 12/29/06

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE