HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.

Posted by:
Daphne24 12:37 pm UTC 12/29/06
In reply to: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Lasse86b 09:43 am UTC 12/29/06

Hasn't there been enough forced 'outings' of celebrities recently? First, whatshisname from Grey's Anatomy and then Doogie Howser.

Now...you seem to want to do the same thing. I'm with Wenners - why?? I'm among the curious but it matters so infinitessimally little, that I don't care.

If he'd wanted to answer the question, he would have in his blog. Actually, if he wanted to answer this particular question, he would have years ago.




reply |

Previous: Jim replied to his sexuality question on his blog yesterday... - RatLoaf 01:21 am UTC 12/30/06
Next: re: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Pudding 07:36 pm UTC 12/29/06

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE