HOME
|
MAIN BOARD
|
TWITTER
|
LOGIN
|
REGISTER
|
SEARCH
|
FLAT MODE
not logged in
re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.
Posted by:
Pudding
07:36 pm UTC 12/29/06
In reply to:
re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.
-
Daphne24
12:37 pm UTC 12/29/06
> Hasn't there been enough forced 'outings' of celebrities recently?
They're the neo-homo's I was talking about, they're a pain in the f*cking arse - no pun intended.
Pud
reply
|
Previous:
re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.
-
Daphne24
12:37 pm UTC 12/29/06
Next:
re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.
-
Daphne24
08:08 pm UTC 12/29/06
Thread:
re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.
-
Daphne24
08:08 pm UTC 12/29/06
(5)
re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.
-
Pudding
08:38 pm UTC 12/29/06
(4)
re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.
-
Lasse86b
10:39 am UTC 12/30/06
re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.
-
Daphne24
09:25 pm UTC 12/29/06
(1)
re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.
-
Pudding
11:15 pm UTC 12/29/06
re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.
-
tragichippy
09:18 pm UTC 12/29/06
HOME
|
MAIN BOARD
|
LOG OFF
|
START A NEW THREAD
|
EDIT PROFILE
|
SEARCH
|
FLAT MODE