HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Regarding Jim's sexuality.

Posted by:
Daphne24 01:08 pm MST 12/29/06
In reply to: re: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Pudding 12:36 pm MST 12/29/06

Could you define "neo-homo" though? Do you think they're somehow less gay? I'm just curious.

> > Hasn't there been enough forced 'outings' of celebrities recently?
>
> They're the neo-homo's I was talking about, they're a pain
> in the f*cking arse - no pun intended.
>
> Pud


reply |

Previous: re: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Pudding 12:36 pm MST 12/29/06
Next: re: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Pudding 01:38 pm MST 12/29/06

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | JIM'S BLOG | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE