| re: Regarding Jim's sexuality. | |
|
Posted by: |
Lasse86b 10:39 am UTC 12/30/06 |
| In reply to: | re: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Pudding 08:38 pm UTC 12/29/06 |
| Well I don't wanna get offended by this, even though it is quite the insult. There seem to be the belief that I wan't Jim to be gay. Which is definitely not the case. I'm just curious to know. And without getting too personal, I don't believe myself to have any unresolved sexual issues. I'm with my boyfriend for three years now, and out to anyone, I have lots of straight friends, no gay ones, and believe me. In Denmark where I come from sexuality is really not an issue. The first gay marriage here was in '89 so there's nooo need for anyone to out anyone else in order for them to bolster anything. And btw, Pud, YOU seem scared that somebody's gonna color the world rainbow, which I think is a very vague description to start with. And besides, being so dead set that it DOESN'T make a difference, shouldn't you be the last to care? But anyway. I see that no one knows about Jim's sexuality. That is just fine, but It'd be nice to be able to ask without being judged a neo-homo. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Pudding 08:38 pm UTC 12/29/06 |
| Next: | re: Regarding Jim's sexuality. - Daphne24 09:25 pm UTC 12/29/06 |
| Thread: | |