| re: Lurkers? Please say hello | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 08:29 am UTC 06/08/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Lurkers? Please say hello - Jacqueline 07:39 am UTC 06/08/07 |
> Really? You got that? It was so subtle and none of us > could guess who he was talking about. > What was subtle, in my thinking, was the asterisk itself. Without words it said to me, that my voice is acknowledged, that there is a difference I speak of, and that without that, it was being said he met Jim. I did not believe that there was any ambiguity or vagueness of who he was meaning. The "it" that I got, was the "it" that I expressed. And I was not being snide. I was nodding. Saying, yeah, I know what you mean and its cool. I don't really bother Dave, even though Dave is clearly bothered. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Lurkers? Please say hello - pidunk 10:03 am UTC 06/08/07 |
| Next: | re: Lurkers? Please say hello - pidunk 07:42 am UTC 06/08/07 |
| Thread: | |