HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Lurkers? Please say hello

Posted by:
pidunk 08:29 am UTC 06/08/07
In reply to: re: Lurkers? Please say hello - Jacqueline 07:39 am UTC 06/08/07



> Really? You got that? It was so subtle and none of us
> could guess who he was talking about.
>

What was subtle, in my thinking, was the asterisk itself. Without words it said to me, that my voice is acknowledged, that there is a difference I speak of, and that without that, it was being said he met Jim. I did not believe that there was any ambiguity or vagueness of who he was meaning. The "it" that I got, was the "it" that I expressed. And I was not being snide. I was nodding. Saying, yeah, I know what you mean and its cool.

I don't really bother Dave, even though Dave is clearly bothered.




reply |

Previous: re: Lurkers? Please say hello - pidunk 10:03 am UTC 06/08/07
Next: re: Lurkers? Please say hello - pidunk 07:42 am UTC 06/08/07

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE