re: Lurkers? Please say hello | |
Posted by: ![]() |
pidunk 10:23 am UTC 06/08/07 |
In reply to: | re: Lurkers? Please say hello - daveake 09:53 am UTC 06/08/07 |
> Of course. But I think that first you'd have to invent > another Jim who doesn't want his music to be heard. > Did you read the posts that were dubbed for lack of better tags, "show and tell"? It was not for your benefit that I posted them but for Jim's to see, however, while it is here, I ask, if you read them? What kind of fan do you consider yourself to be? You think that sharing files to a small group, sans the one person who knows Jim the longest, is going to gain favor to you in his eyes? I'd like to learn the proper protocol for treating a fan. A fan, is someone who does what exactly, stays dumb in the shadows about the illusions that they embrace for their fantasies to maintain a love that is based on illusion? That's what loopy really is, isn't it? If you want to be a fan and a fan is someone who is dumb, then I am certain that I need to learn to treat you like you are dumb. Because it is clear that is all you want to be. Jim's life is not perfect. He has not had perfect experiences. He has not had common needs. Both of us, he and I, are at the present time, lucky to be alive. He is lucky that he managed to live long enough dodging the forces that would have silenced him a long time ago, by the good graces of innovative living, innovative strategies, and why is the telling now, is because what was the zig successful then, is the zag successful now, and he must be seen. Be dumb all you want, but if you are smart, you'd help me be his friend. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Lurkers? Please say hello - daveake 09:53 am UTC 06/08/07 |
Next: | re: Lurkers? Please say hello - daveake 08:59 pm UTC 06/08/07 |
Thread: |
|