HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Sacked by Sonnenberg

Posted by:
Scaramouche 08:51 pm UTC 06/14/07
In reply to: Sacked by Sonnenberg - Scaramouche 08:24 pm UTC 06/14/07

Further:

I always viewed Jim as the 'link' between Tanz and DOTV (as Polanski & Kunze weren't involved), and that he had a big responsibility in maintaining the reputation and quality of Tanz.

It would be interesting to know how much creative control he had at the start (if any), and how, why & when he started to lose that control.

Did he agree with the choices of Crawford & Rando?
What happened to John Caird?
Why did he allow Angels Arise to be used, if he didn't agree with it's inclusion?
Who okayed Crawford's shitty Italian accent??




> Perhaps not intentional, but I like how Jim drops little
> crumbs of info into his blogs.
>
> I always presumed that Jim 'walked' from DOTVampires in
> exasperation, and not 'pushed' by Sonnenberg.
>
> This tends to suggest that Jim intended to stay on board
> until at least after 'opening night', and was kicking up a
> fuss with the direction of the show?
>
> Presumably Sonnenberg got pissed off with it, and in his
> capacity as one of the 'producers', sacked his composer.
>
> Kind of ironic, 'cos I also read that Sonnenberg was asked
> to leave the production at some point, as he never came up
> with his promised investment??
>
> I've never heard of the composer being 'sacked' from a
> production before, especially by his so called 'manager',
> and Sonnenberg's involvement in DOTV, from start to
> finish, does seem shambolic??
>
> Make a great chapter in Jim's autobiography one day.


reply |

Previous: re: Well - Markus 07:11 am UTC 06/15/07
Next: re: Sacked by Sonnenberg - tealcyfre 12:50 am UTC 06/15/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE