re: Sacked by Sonnenberg | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Scaramouche 08:51 pm UTC 06/14/07 |
In reply to: | Sacked by Sonnenberg - Scaramouche 08:24 pm UTC 06/14/07 |
Further: I always viewed Jim as the 'link' between Tanz and DOTV (as Polanski & Kunze weren't involved), and that he had a big responsibility in maintaining the reputation and quality of Tanz. It would be interesting to know how much creative control he had at the start (if any), and how, why & when he started to lose that control. Did he agree with the choices of Crawford & Rando? What happened to John Caird? Why did he allow Angels Arise to be used, if he didn't agree with it's inclusion? Who okayed Crawford's shitty Italian accent?? > Perhaps not intentional, but I like how Jim drops little > crumbs of info into his blogs. > > I always presumed that Jim 'walked' from DOTVampires in > exasperation, and not 'pushed' by Sonnenberg. > > This tends to suggest that Jim intended to stay on board > until at least after 'opening night', and was kicking up a > fuss with the direction of the show? > > Presumably Sonnenberg got pissed off with it, and in his > capacity as one of the 'producers', sacked his composer. > > Kind of ironic, 'cos I also read that Sonnenberg was asked > to leave the production at some point, as he never came up > with his promised investment?? > > I've never heard of the composer being 'sacked' from a > production before, especially by his so called 'manager', > and Sonnenberg's involvement in DOTV, from start to > finish, does seem shambolic?? > > Make a great chapter in Jim's autobiography one day. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Well - Markus 07:11 am UTC 06/15/07 |
Next: | re: Sacked by Sonnenberg - tealcyfre 12:50 am UTC 06/15/07 |
Thread: |
|