| re: Is Nothing Sacred - Darren Holden | |
|
Posted by: |
extensionboy 05:10 am UTC 06/16/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Is Nothing Sacred - Darren Holden - Jay 01:32 pm UTC 06/12/07 |
| I don'y think the diction is that much of an issue here,I will have to re-listen. On first listen though....blown away by the power and range this guy has.I would love to hear him sing something fresh from the genial mind of Jim. > I have to agree about the diction. His diction really is > funky in certain places. I get every word, but there's > some diphthongs missing and and accents on certain words, > vowels, and syllables that just makes it sound a slight > bit odd in places. Otherwise, I love his high stuff, he > has a really great upper range. > > Thanks for sharing Pudding, > > jay > > > I'm not too crazy about his pronounciation at all times, > > but his voice is really great. The song itself is a bit > > weak with only piano, it requires far more power in the > > production. But nice effort, if this guy is given the > > right songs he could definitely become a big star. Love > > the country-influence in his voice, he could probably do a > > great "Two Out Of Three". > > > > Other than that, Russell Watson's version of this song is > > the best IMO. > > > > > Not stopping as PIssDrUNK is still on the loose with > > > insane madness. However, just wanted to let the good folks > > > know that I've added Darren Holden's version of Is Nothing > > > Sacred to the blog and it's pretty good since he only did > > > it in 1 take. > > > > > > You don't have to thank me, just take the file and go. > > > > > > Pud | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Is Nothing Sacred - Darren Holden - Jay 01:32 pm UTC 06/12/07 |
| Next: | re: Is Nothing Sacred - Darren Holden - Pudding 05:59 am UTC 06/16/07 |
| Thread: |
|