re: Bad For Good (the song) | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Klasien 09:00 am UTC 06/18/07 |
In reply to: | re: Bad For Good (the song) - Wilbury 01:00 pm UTC 06/16/07 |
Since that is one of my most favourite Jimsongs I cannot agree with you there... Everything Louder has to stay... but yes, we would be speculating regardless of the album or outcome... K. > > > I would have rather had the songs we > > got on Bat II than any hypothetical lineup. The songs were > > perfect, and an Okay Version of Bad for Good + Any Song > > from Bat II is better, in my opinion, than an Excellent > > Version of Bad for Good - One of the Songs from Bat II. > > > Interesting equation :o) . I understand your point, but I > can't help but feel that we only feel this way because we > don't know what we're missing. We'd feel the exact same > way if we were sitting around discussing Bat out of > Hell 2: Original Sin, released in 1990. But I ask you > -- which parallel universe is best?! :o) > > But that aside, I'm going to go out on a limb here... and > say I'd rather have a Bat 2 era Stein-produced version of > Bad For Good with Meat on vocals than Everything Louder > Than Everything Else. :-O | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Bad For Good (the song) - Wilbury 01:00 pm UTC 06/16/07 |
Next: | re: Bad For Good (the song) - rockfenris2005 07:01 am UTC 06/16/07 |
Thread: |