Wow. I mean, yeah, I've done some crazy (and naive) shit that doesn't deserve defending in my time, but thanks, guys. Pud in particular -- it must have taken a lot to defend me, especially because of the shit I've said in the past. Thanks.
> Nor did Gibson claim that people had insider knowledge on
> John Lennon's assasination and made/received phone calls
> that night conveying such information; nor did he claim to
> have accurate information on me that was ALL total
> fabrication to the point that it was scary.
> This chick is a total nut.
> Jim is a tactful, kind gentleman who tried to tell Susan
> to fuck off as gently as possible--but of course, that
> isn't THE Jim she really meant!
> You know, if Jim is really all these different Jims, or if
> we in fact HAVE many different Jims running about, doesn't
> that make the author of Jim's blog himself an imposter
> which merits him banning himself?
> It does get complex--but mainly just stupid.
> And yes, JD does see this, I think, as fan fiction and Jim
> isn't sure how just to deal with the pure bullshit he
> knows it is fer sher.
> Cheers!
> Leesa
|
