Exactly so, and well put :-)
Dave
>
> Well, nothing can be a coincidence for coincidence-sake.
> It's either all a big conspiracy or she gets so many
> 'clues' during her 'investigations' that she begins
> fabricating wild conclusion that take on lives of their
> own--then when faced with facts that shoot her
> meticulously constructed findings down, her rationale is
> that she's already put in so much work to the
> investigation, that it can't be wrong--and she tries to
> move heaven and earth to make reality fit. That's why
> she's already coming up with excuses as to why Jim claims
> he's never met her--which, stepping back from and looking
> at, really is damned scary. It's a matter of making
> reality fit into her fantasies and miscues.
> Where have we heard this before?
> Leesa
>
>
> > Yeah, when she was here first time she was trying to prove
> > that I'm actually some American musician called "Dave Ake"
> > (who is presumably of Norwegian descent). This despite
> > the fact that she knows what my web server's primary
> > domain name is, and that happens to be my actual name.
> > Maybe she thinks that's all part of a cover-up. When I
> > told her she was wrong she said "You don't know who you
> > are". LMAO
> >
> > No wonder she's short of sugar - nuts are all protein.
> >
> > Dave
|
