> > I back every fact up with visuals and sources
>
> Not true.
>
> Which, in the case of your alleged "lie down and think of
> England", is just as well ...
>
> Dave
I have got no idea what you are referring to, and just so that you know, it is a fact that I do identify the source of every thing that I write. I write whether it is from Jim's statements either in paraphrase or quote, I write whether it is from my own first-hand experience or if it was something that someone told to me, I write whether it is from a written text or from something heard, and on. Where there are interpretations, I write the reason and source of that which is the basis of the interpretation, I provide visuals where possible, I provide analogies and sources of backgrounds which back up the line of interpretation, and I do differentiate whether something is a statement, an inference, or supposition. I do identify each of these, pertaining to their applications. And I do it painstakingly. Just because you wear your eyeglasses only for every third word, is not on me.
Give the speed-reading a break, and look at the whole writing for its structure and presentation. You could ask questions which you know how to do, but don't. Hmmph.
|
