| re: Hello Again | |
|
Posted by: |
Bright_Eyes 11:42 pm UTC 08/11/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Hello Again - stewbeef 10:56 pm UTC 08/11/07 |
| To answer your question, which has NOTHING to do with anything in my post: If you read the board, you should already know the answer. Pidunk has disagreed with some of what I posted. But how much we agree or disagree is not relevant to anything in my post. > oh hello does that mean you agree with everthing susan > says.ive been on this board for a couple of years and i > agree with most things smeg and pud post. > > > I hate to add to a thread that is about this sort of > > thing, because the music threads are so much better. > > Starting a thread about what you don't like about other > > fans of that music is a waste, i.e. filling the board with > > crap. > > > > Your statements, that pidunk annoys everybody and ruins > > the board for everybody, are lies. > > > > That board-member does not annoy me, I've found her > > pleasant to post with. And no one person has the power to > > ruin a message board by herself. She can't force anybody > > to do anything. > > > > I consider your posts harassment and flaming, and on a > > great many boards you'd be banned by now just for today's > > posts. Pidunk hasn't done anything that violates a stated > > or implied rule of this board. > > > > Between the two of you there's no question that you are > > closer to deserving a ban, in my opinion. But my opinion > > doesn't matter, because this board is a benevolent > > dictatorship and not a democracy. There is no point in > > trying to persuade the admins of this board to ban > > someone. It should very obvious by now that it doesn't > > work. > > > > The more hostile you are toward pidunk, the less you'll > > like her response to that. That is how it tends to work > > with people in general, not just pidunk. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Hello Again - stewbeef 10:56 pm UTC 08/11/07 |
| Next: | re: Hello Again - Pudding 11:35 pm UTC 08/11/07 |
| Thread: | |