| re: Were still the chirldren | |
|
Posted by: |
Scaramouche 11:31 am UTC 08/15/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Were still the chirldren - Rob 11:14 am UTC 08/15/07 |
| Agree with all of that, especially 'Wonderful Toys', although that is almost spoken word with a tempo! LOL. I also think Jim nailed 'Left In The Dark', and no-one has come close (yet)? Not everything has to be 'vocally perfect', to be perfect for the song? > I have to agree Jim hasn't got the voice for his songs - > that's why he used Meat Loaf in the first place after all. > Some of Jim's fans do tend to treat his demos with a > reverence that they perhaps don't deserve, but I find them > 'interesting' in that they show how Jim envisaged the song > sounding when he wrote it. > > For instance, there's no doubting TDE have better voices, > but I prefer the simplicty of Jim's 'Still the > Children...' for much the same reasons as Pud. It just > sounds better, less cluttered and carries more emotional > weight - not so much due to Jim's vocals, more the stark > nature of the arrangement. > > The only song where I think Jim's voice really works and > can't imagine anyone doing much better is 'Wonderful > Toys'. It's not a song that demands a great singer, more a > great wordsmith with the right attitude and I think Jim > nails it perfectly. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Were still the chirldren - Rob 11:14 am UTC 08/15/07 |
| Next: | re: Were still the chirldren - Pudding 05:06 am UTC 08/15/07 |
| Thread: | |