| re: Jim has authorized me to give Susan a message | |
|
Posted by: |
Rob 09:55 pm UTC 08/17/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim has authorized me to give Susan a message - Pudding 09:14 pm UTC 08/17/07 |
| > > You do realise there is more effort required to click on > > her posts and respond to them than if you just choose to > > ignore them don't you? > > I wouldn't exactly class a couple of clicks on the mouse > as effort. > > As I stated in an above post, if my responding and > highlighting Susan's bullshit, which I will carry on doing > everytime she spouts crap, upsets you or others, then why > don't you and others ignore me? > > Don't be an hypocrit and ask others to do what you are not > willing to do yourself. I'm hardly being a hypocrite. I find posts hoping that Susan dies and calling her a cunt unpleasant and that's what I am objecting to. I don't actively seek out all your posts or Smeg's and reply to them, I'm just voicing my opinion on this particular thread. You stated that you would be happy with an 'ignore' feature that allowed you to filter out Susan's posts without any effort. Yet you go to the effort of reading her posts and responding them rather than exercise a modicum of self-control. That just strikes as me as rather silly and, frankly, counter-productive. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim has authorized me to give Susan a message - Pudding 09:14 pm UTC 08/17/07 |
| Next: | re: Jim has authorized me to give Susan a message - Pudding 10:49 pm UTC 08/17/07 |
| Thread: |
|