In New Zealand, where Jim did not even make a performance during the original Bat tour, just exactly where is your justification for calling my statements lies and bullshit? Just because of one funny blog entry? The blog entry which you cling to is so hilarious because it is intended, in my view, to be so contradictory to the truths that are unavoidable in all that I have written and represented, as to be dismissable out of hand, like the blog tests of yore. Now, I have said other things about this because of the Steinman-Cypherd differences, but when you really put all the explanations together, which are the facets interpretable of the blog you cling to, you have to admit that what I write makes sense and the very solid nature of it is its own credibility. I don't have to defend MYSELF for this, and wonder how am I gonna get this Pud to see things my way, because you won't. So, just because you don't, why don't you just paint a picture of yourself and put a dunce cap on that and make it your avatar instead. Just say, you don't get it, you can't fathom it, you are thicker than a brick, and let the whole thing go. Because otherwise it just does not make sense to ride me like some kind of saddled animal, because my logic and consistency throws you off every time. ne-ee-eeee!
>
> src="http://www.daveakerman.com/pudding/pudding.jpg">
>
> Had Susan not posted a load of insane comments about Jim,
> started lying about having a relationship with Jim and
> other crazy fairytales and continue to post complete and
> utter bullshit that has no relevance to anything, then
> yeah, she might have become a well-liked member of the
> board.
>
> Don't forget, Susan decided herself to tell lies and
> bullshit, no one asked her to, and when people started
> going against her, she still carried on posting lies and
> bullshit. So don't try and make out Susan is innocent in
> anything.
|
