not logged in
| re: Jacqueline. A question for you. | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 12:07 pm UTC 08/24/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Jacqueline. A question for you. - Bright_Eyes 10:18 pm UTC 08/23/07 |
| Right I have bad spelling I know. But I type really fast and can never be bothered to correct myself. Now, I happen to AGREE with Pud and Smeg. Not copying what they said simply because they said it. And I believe I am a smart guy (bar the lazy spelling) The experiences I have gone through in my 15 year life (I am 15 by the way) has made me wise and richer for them I'm not trying to blow my own horn here. But I won’t have lying low life like Susan say I'm stupid. And we cannot talk about Jim's work with Susan posting shit. Then that leads to arguments and completely ruins the thread. And I have plenty to say about Jim's work. Jim’s music has proved it can make good times better and the bad times seem easier I must thank you bright eyes. You gave the kick up the ass I needed to start being (for want of a better word) louder on this board. I have many opinions I’d like to share with you all.. And I will start posing on threads more often. And start a few of my own. My closing statement is this. Pudding once made a post that Susan disagreed with, and started calling him every name under the sun. She’s a troublemaker. I'm glad she seems to have pissed of > I know your post was addressed to Jacqueline but since > you've started the thread I'll give you an opposing > perspective to think about. Just in case Jacqueline > doesn't have time to post in your thread. > > > Have you at all asked Susan to stop her lies. BEcause I > > have been considering(Not that anyone here cares) about > > slipping into lerker mode until she stops. > > The people whose opinions you parrot act as if this whole > internet fan message board is good enough to be published > in an academic journal, unless the post is by Susan, and > then it is like an O.J. Simpson testimony. The truth is > much more complex and multi-faceted than that. From all > parts of this board there is a wide variety in terms of > accuracy, evidence, reasoning, and intentions. > > This is just my guess, but if the admin adopted a policy > of challenging or censoring any post that she thought had > an element of inaccuracy or dishonesty (and those are two > different things), a lot of posts challenged or deleted > would not be those written by Susan, or even by me. It > would become a huge full-time job that would have shut > down a lot of the internet-fan-forum discussions on the > history of this board. Especially the speculative content, > which is generally a big part of internet fan forum > discussion. In general there's a lot of stuff out there > about Jim that could be classified as speculation, rumors, > mythology, journalist fabrication, fan fabrication et > cetera. > > > > Before she was > > amusing. But then she started making jibes at me, saying I > > am not educated. How dare she start saying shit like that > > all because she dose not agree with my posts. How can you > > allow this to happen. > > You really, really are not educated. You might think you > are, but trust me you are not. You once claimed you were > something like 16 years old. How many degrees is a guy > supposed to have completed by then. Your spelling and > writing in general is among the worst on the board, and > many here are from countries where English is not the main > language. > > Your posts contain little or no original thought. The vast > majority of it is parroted mindlessly from Smeghead and > Pudding's posts. If you were to take their opinions and > just try to word them differently, at least that would be > a step in the direction of independent thinking for you. > > > And its not just me. Lessa has > > complained about how Susan claims to know her. Smeghead > > siad were all Susan lovers. Well Im not and Im sorry he > > left. Only a few people here( Pudiing,to name but one) > > Still talk sense. Its as though this board is changin to > > acomadate Susans ramblings. Which isnt fair. I came here > > to talk about the works of Jim Stienman. But it seems most > > people here are distressed by Susan so much there leaving. > > It really is not true that "most people" or "half of us" > have left because of Susan. I'm guessing you are only > saying this because Smeghead said it, and have not even > spent a second thinking if it is even true or not. I can > think of only one person who says he did this, that was > Smeghead. Except for him, the few who announced they were > doing this, they started posting again within a small > number of days, as people who feel the need to announce > they are leaving this forum typically do. > > Susan's posting has not prevented anybody from discussion > of the works of "Jim Stienman". Whenever a thread about > him comes up people have no problem posting in it if they > feel like it. You do not seem to have much to say about > Jim's work, but if you did you could change by yourself > the amount of Jim-relevant discussion here. > > > But the most unfortunate thing about it os. That Susanm > > dosent go away to a bigger community. She posts on You > > tube(Susan, torchwood11 right here) and refers to Susan in > > the third person. Claiming to be someone else.(Its the > > smae person. They Spout the crap) So. PLease tell her to > > stop. And maybe will have more active threads. rarthe then > > the ghost town we have at the present > > Nobody has ever forced you to read a Susan post, so my > advice would be to not read them. You can't complain, or > in your case, copy-and-paste the complaints of Smeg and > Pudding, if you don't read the posts in the first place. I > read them, and I'd much rather read anyone who thinks > independently than a message board parrot. The board > continues to have many Jim-relevant threads and can have > as many as people create and post in. > > Best, > > Bright | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jacqueline. A question for you. - Bright_Eyes 10:18 pm UTC 08/23/07 |
| Next: | Conspiracy time - Pudding 10:25 pm UTC 08/23/07 |
| Thread: | |