not logged in
| re: Forum updates? | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 11:47 pm UTC 08/27/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Forum updates? - Pudding 06:09 am UTC 08/26/07 |
> > Didn't Susan start doing this sort of thing right before > > she was banned the first time? > > Yep, that's why I'd like admin to check hers and Susan's > IP's to see if they're either very close to each other or > the same, as I've got my suspicions this board is being > used as a pisstake. Saying that, I don't think admin > really give a flying banana and is almost encouraging it. > There are a few things that I am certain of. First, that I did not do those things......and the nature of the repetitions here are very cute and I laughed alot. The nature of the repetitions in the imposter/satirical poster of 2005 was to do silly things like repeat my name, and only my name, for column after column, followed by, statements of that the person is not me, column after column. It was a mess. But that was not my mess. Second, I was not, as has been recently discussed, banned from the board. Bright_Eyes has a sense of humor. I really liked the post, which I read and just had to laugh at, and if you follow along the posts you might follow about why....but if you can't, then don't sweat it, it is just beyond your ability to comprehend, just like my site. On the subject of my site, I have chosen to make access of it to the Pacific Time Zone end of Thursday, August 30th, and you can go there or not go there as you wish. It could probably be available again for viewing at the end of October (in time for Halloween? I don't know). It may or may not contain the same content as it has now. I have not decided on it. I am certain that I am updating some pages, in both content and structure. But then the complete site will go up all at once, not in piecemeal fashion like this site and its primitive predecessor had been. There are many sections to the website, and reasons you may like to view them may have more or less to do with Jim Cypherd, Jim Steinman, or even music. I discuss some issues of interest to people who are interested in family histories and the ways that some may go obscure, and I also discuss the topic of reincarnation. Whether or not you believe in such things, if you are curious you may like to see some more input on the subject from this angle of it. Of course, I do also discuss the situation with concern to Rocky Horror, which is no doubt a controversy, and which has much of work put into it and probably much more to do. But as it stands, I can think of no other comprehensive literary analysis work like it in published media. As an analysis, it takes many aspects and puts them against the comparative scrutiny one may have. One has to put their thinking cap on. I have not been linking to the site but here I shall give some addresses to some of the pages which you may find of interest. The entry page is Lily Sincere, Stripping Illusion: A First Hand Struggle At Truth This page focuses on the work of Rocky Horror as having been the cornerstone for the site's beginnings, as it was hardly necessary for me to be a redundant Jim site maker, and this issue is the one that was most in need of address. This first page shows the introduction of the premise but does not present the analysis itself...it is like a bit of a sample of what you would find, and gives the most rudimentary elements of why it would be of interest to you to delve into further. I debunk some claims there, about who did what, whose lips were whose, and so on. The analysis does much more in much intense detail, however, and is on a different page. There are two parts. One is the continuation of the first page here, which begins to explain the theatrical elements of the situation, and which is intended as a part two as it were, to the first page which shows the premise because it brings more to light of it; this second page is Rocky Horror In The World Of Theatre. On this page I make parallels to Rocky Horror and Neverland. If you are interested in these works as stage/theatrical literary works then you may find interesting reading, including quotes from Jim Cypherd on the subject. I would consider a third page as an extention to this one, which emulates the title "Other Children" from this site, in reference to other London Stage productions also done by Jim Cypherd using the name Richard O'Brien. This is Lesser Known Stage Triumphs of Richard O'Brien When the controversy arose about who is Richard O'Brien, these works were already long done and gone as active productions. There is some discussion there about Jim Cypherd's family theatrical roots. It also introduces some of the other controversial elements of Jim Cypherd's professional endeavors, including his tenure doubling for Anton Fig in the drumming scene, and having a rousing good time and reputation at that, deservedly so. At that point, the analysis would be appropriate to read if one is interested in such advanced reading. It takes five hours to read this one page, which is a virtual book called What Happened To Rocky Horror? which features many, many quotes from Jim Cypherd and insights from my own experiences at the Waverly Theater in 1976. This IS the crux of the controversy about Rocky Horror, and because it is so controversial I have done much painstaking work at pointing out elements needing comparison and showing them to the best of my technological abilities at the time of the writing. There are people who are bound to object to their mention on this chapter, in this book, but there are reasons and backings for them, including the apparently newly befriended pair of Leesas, and other people who are not actively trying to make me look like an idiot. I state clearly in every juncture reasons for statements and not a bit of insincerity or slander is here. But, as controversies go, people would scream and shout, and try to attack the various parts of it, which has been seen on this site through various efforts. I don't like it when people say things like "the book that the government does not want you to read" but here, I feel it is more than apropos, as this is the analysis that the Rocky Horror cult does not want you to read. If you are so inclined, then have a good read. If not, then of course the website is just not for you. Other pages concern things like Jim Cypherd's strong feelings of connections to Richard Wagner, and I took two angles in this regard, being as there are elements of family history and reincarnation I felt worthy of investigating. This is on the page Wagner's Significance To Jim. Then you can go through the links list at the bottom of each page as you would like to see about other things. If you do not want to see the site, then all you need to do is NOT click on the links. Where applicable, Fair Use of the U.S. Copyright Act is complied with, and the site is intended as an educational and journalistic approach to the topics at hand. There are no media downloads but one, and the copyright is clearly marked, and as they are salient to the point being made also comply with Fair Use of the Copyright law. In complying with Fair Use, there is a set of standards and criteria which these applications apply to, which these applications are in compliance of. Other than that, anyone unhappy with something in there, ought not have exposed themselves to such that extent of becoming unhappy with their being shown. Dishonesty is met with honesty, and the two are diametrically opposed, hence the controversy. Controversies are never easy. But there is sometimes the inevitable occurrences of them. If you read it, I hope it gives you something to think about which you might enjoy having thought of. Until some approximate time to 11:59pm Pacific Time (GMT-7) of Thursday, August 30, these pages will be available to you for viewing. Next, I think that the phrase "piss-take" is maligned....when we go to that place to do that sort of a thing, are we said to be "relieving ourselves"? Other than that, I think that the people doing the piss-takes are not the ones being the butts of rhetorical insults. Best, Susan | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Forum updates? - Pudding 06:09 am UTC 08/26/07 |
| Next: | re: Forum updates? - LordRahl 10:01 pm UTC 08/26/07 |
| Thread: | |