| re: Boston Herald Meat Review | |
|
Posted by: |
Leesa (gallytrotter@mchsi.com) 01:35 am UTC 08/29/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Boston Herald Meat Review - LeesaJohn 12:44 am UTC 08/29/07 |
| Oh shit--they joke about the Stones? And I cited Charlie Watts as a positive example! Boy, and I thought that the Loaf had surpassed the Stones in being passed it! Whoops! Leesa J (in Iowa!) > The one thing I would hate to see is Meatloaf's touring > getting to be like the Stones. Just a desperate attempt > to keep his name out there. Not saying that's the case > now. I don't know. But, I would hate it to get to the > point that people would start to joke about him the way > they joke about the Stones. > > > I agree to a certain extent though I don't think it's all > > doom and gloom. > > Meat still sounded amazing on Bat 3 I think regardless of > > how it was puzzled together. > > Also Meat sounded pretty damn good during Anything for > > Love at the second MSG show. Apparently those shows were > > really good going by the ones I know had went. > > > > While you might be right about John Deacon and understand > > what you mean I hardly think you can compare a very > > passive looking/acting Bass player to Meat Loaf. > > > > Meat should simply not tour so intesively I believe. A few > > shows here and there (what he originally said the Bat 3 > > tour was gonna be) would probably have been fine. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Boston Herald Meat Review - LeesaJohn 12:44 am UTC 08/29/07 |
| Next: | re: Boston Herald Meat Review - LeesaJohn 03:24 am UTC 08/29/07 |
| Thread: |
|