| re: Two Out Of Three - How it was meant to be? | |
|
Posted by: |
sufcste 04:43 pm UTC 09/07/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Two Out Of Three - How it was meant to be? - The_Jackster 11:18 pm UTC 09/06/07 |
| I don't think it is a realistic illustration of how the 'original' would have sounded. Although it has been slowed down, the pitch is identical. The slowing down hasn't reversed the effects of the original speeding up. Obviously, the 'original' would have been lower pitched. > Blows Meat's theory to shreds, because even slowed down, > the vocal track is as high as he says it shouldn't be, > which is obvious to any ear. Meat's just trying to avoid > the inevitable question of "Why are you still touring if > you can't sing?" > > > Meat said on the recent TV show that Bat 1 was sped up by > > an 8th, so here is Two Out Of Three slowed down by an > > 8th. > > > > Any thoughts? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Two Out Of Three - How it was meant to be? - The_Jackster 11:18 pm UTC 09/06/07 |
| Next: | re: Two Out Of Three - How it was meant to be? - pidunk 06:33 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| Thread: | |