| re: Whistle gets a second wind |
|
Posted by:
 |
Markus 11:23 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| In reply to: |
re: Whistle gets a second wind - Rob 11:17 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
|
True. I may have said things too that are nothing to be proud of but I never wanted her dead or told her to jump out of the window because I was never even THINKING about something like that.
But just like the front against her (stories) she was never willing to help to quiet the minds of all people included in this mess.
Btw, I agree with what you on that:
http://jimsteinman.com/messageboard/d.php?id=15251
Markus.
> Whilst I agree with a lot of what you have said here
> Markus - there is NO excuse for some of the responses that
> Susan has received on here. They have been vile and sick,
> and "frustration" or "anger" at what she says is no
> excuse.
>
> I think some members of this board need to have a long,
> hard look at themselves whatever the outcome of this whole
> episode is.
>
> > What have you expected Jacqueline? I think RadioMasters
> > idea was very very good because so it wonīt be necessary
> > to ban anyone. Just a click and the Cypherd stuff would be
> > ignored easily. Like a spam mail (what it acutally is).
> > Again, I wonīt comment on her posts anymore. At least Iīll
> > try. You know what the problem is? Some people may want to
> > give this sad individuum a chance. Iīd call myself such a
> > person. So I try to ignore her posts but then again I
> > think letīs have a look if itīs something useful THIS time
> > and I get disappointed and bothered again and again. Just
> > like this time when I read her reply to your posting. Sad
> > we donīt have this ignore-spam button.
> >
> > Markus.
> >
>
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Whistle gets a second wind - Pudding 07:10 pm UTC 09/10/07 |
| Next: |
re: Whistle gets a second wind - pidunk 11:05 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|