not logged in
| re: she lost it | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 04:43 pm UTC 09/10/07 |
| In reply to: | she lost it - RadioMaster 04:20 pm UTC 09/10/07 |
> not that there would have been anything to lose. > > Instead of posting your usual bullcrap you insult Dave, I think Dave was somewhat overdrawn in the insult accounting, and I had to make a debit. He is not so nice, but you don't pay attention to the insults he makes of me, or of the fact that....... > who is so kind and provides his online space to make the > whole downloading a lot easier for everybody, Except that he not only blocked my IP, but the IP of the entire ISP lest my IP change, to block me from downloading any of his hosted files. He and I discussed this several times, and you didn't realize this? He gets my IP each time it changes and then he blocks it. Then he says he blocked the whole ISP because my IP was changing. I got files he didn't want me to have, while he was giving it to others and the only reason he hosted your files today was because not only did my IP change recently, but so did my ISP, and he wanted to see it to find out what of it he could, and block it at the minimum. I knew not to take that bait, but you are his element of utilization. He used you. There are nice people who are nice because that is their nature, and there are people without nice natures who find it advantageous to be nice, when it is advantageous. Dave was using his position here and still uses his position here, to aid in the general control and constriction of this site. Without him, I doubt highly that you would think me crazy. But not just him, the others who are with him here too. It is too important not to tag my posts, like you just did. You tag my post why, because the next reader can't make up their mind what I am for themselves, so you will give them a nudge in the direction of your influence? Piddle that. How would Dave know that my ISP changed? Because everyone who is connected to the freakin fuckin network knows every fuckin thing about me. Goddamn it, there is no privacy in my private life. Other than that, I can't name the specifics. Maybe they hear it from the same stupid microphone that the Alfred dialogue came from, or some derivative of it. I don't know. I don't care how you think this is crazy talk. It is a ridiculous situation. Every person deals with it differently, and those in it know it is not crazy. My stepfather once said a random statement to me of some of these experiences long ago, he said to me, "Nothing has happened that didn't really happen." Now, you try to make sense of that. >and compare > him to a kidnapper? wtf? Yeah, good touch that. I should have been stronger though. I was giving him a break. >Just bacause he was posting the > link to those files in a new thread?? Nope, it was because he was posted that silly photo after my comment. I was not commenting on the downloads, but his reply to my comment about the downloads. My comment to his downloads was to the effect that he didn't have to use rapidshare because he has his own ISP. He denied having his own ISP but HIS IP when it comes through on my site, shows that he has his own nameservers on pages that he is visiting. Therefore he has his own outbound ISP. It bears his name. My site didn't visit his site. He with his own ISP visited my site. He lied about that, and he posted a photo of a cat which made me feel scared for my animals, and maybe also for myself and for Jim which is usually the case anyway. Which Jim? I don't see Jim Steinman being any the bit nervous about the position he has adopted, but if someone has their way and does a thing to Cypherd, they'll go for Steinman next, just to wipe away the evidence of an irregularity. Jim Steinman is more benefited by my actions than he or most others including Jacqueline realizes. (Now I'll get banned....I always get vanquished when I start making sense) > > This is the only time I answered to your crap, and this > only because instead of posting crap about Jim (who > obviously doesnt care) you insult innocent people who just > provided their bit to the Steinman community. Dave is far from innocent and he cons the Steinman community with contributions which are copyright infringements at best. Oh, and by the way, I do get to choose who is infringing on these copyrights somewhere or other. Not that I have done anything like that before. But the future ain't what it used to be. You don't have to answer any of my other crap if you don't want to, and you don't have to pay attention to others on the board either for these things I discuss as it is not your natural state of affairs. But that I am able to express about it to someone paying attention who expects to pay attention, is a privilege I appreciate. Peace. Best, Susan | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | she lost it - RadioMaster 04:20 pm UTC 09/10/07 |
| Next: | re: she lost it - daveake 04:52 pm UTC 09/10/07 |
| Thread: |
|