HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: So much for the Jim Content

Posted by:
Mr.Egg 11:56 pm UTC 10/20/07
In reply to: So much for the Jim Content - daveake 11:34 pm UTC 10/20/07

My first post to this thread was about X Factor. How is that hijacking the thread? That's what the first two posters were talking about.

The second post was in response to a poster who was trying to have a go at me by saying egg shit and Susan shite (some people are convinced that I am Susan).

I thought I would try not to take it personally. Maybe the outcome of the rugby game upset him.

This post is in response to you. If you don't want me to reply to you, then don't have a go. Like when I said that the Chrysler building was the most charismatic building in the world and you had a go by saying: "You don't get out much."

It is the building that is featured on the front of Bat 2.
For a reason.

I really don't know what you are talking about when you go on about hijacking threads and egg threads.

Could you explain what you mean in a polite, less hysterical way? That would be nice.


> You might find you wind up fewer people if you stop trying
> to hijack threads. There are quite enough egg threads at
> the moment without making this into another one. And WTF
> rugby has to do with it (aside from using an egg-shaped
> ball) I have no idea.
>
> Dave


reply |

Previous: So much for the Jim Content - daveake 11:34 pm UTC 10/20/07
Next: re: So much for the Jim Content - daveake 12:29 am UTC 10/21/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE