| Bright Eyes would make a great lawyer | |
|
Posted by: |
Mr.Egg 03:08 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
| I am convinced that Bright Eyes would make a wonderful lawyer. Is it possible that some people who attack her are jealous of her ability to argue a point with such intellectual skill? Bright Eyes wrote to Leesa: "I notice you only post about your fanatical hatred of Susan, and your paranoia that others are actually Susan. You seem to have nothing else you want to post about. If you were trying to get Susan off the board so you could use the board without her...that would be one thing. Mr.Egg, on the other hand, is one of the only recent posters on this board who has wanted to discuss a Steinman project or his work. I have no idea why some here care so much about whether posts about the Bat musical are in one thread or not. It's not like there's a lot of other Jim discussion on here. Makes no difference to me. There really is no reason to believe Mr.Egg is Susan. Same with Belmont. I've read Susan's posts, and they have almost nothing in common with any other member. Lots of people have posted replies to their own posts, including you and Jacqueline and others whose identity is never questioned. There isn't a single poster in the history of this message board whose posts have been similar to Susan's. Perhaps you should enlighten me on what specifically you think everyone has "figured out". For the record, I am against IP stamping. Do we really want this board to turn into something where every new member gets interrogated about their history and location, and has a long discussion on the board about it? If the board had been like that when you first joined, would you have ever become a regular member? I would guess probably not. For every one of the long-time members who are unjustifiably getting paranoid and territorial toward newer members, I bet they would not have become regulars had the board been as hostile, cliquish and paranoid as it is now when they first joined. IP stamping will encourage that paranoia and the whole cyber stalking mentality. IP and member history checking should be done privately by the moderators, not out in the open cluttering the board, where it is subject to the cliques and grudges. If they do implement IP stamping, I think it should be done so that only posts after a certain date are stamped. When we all registered for this board, we were never told IP addresses would be made public, and in my book that is understood to be something the moderators should keep private. That way, the posters who were never told that their IP addresses would be made public can choose whether or not to continue posting. And please do not insinuate, as usual without a shred of evidence, that I have the same IP address as Susan. I know hers from when she joined the Cypherd board (which I set up only to show Smeghead how easy it is to set up your own board) and it is neither identical nor very similar to mine." | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Cypherd board - Mr.Egg 04:19 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
| Next: | re: Bright Eyes would make a great lawyer - stewbeef 06:57 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
| Thread: |
|