| re: Pidnuk (a little bit scary) | |
|
Posted by: |
Leesa (gallytrotter@mchsi.com) 07:21 pm UTC 10/22/07 |
| In reply to: | Pidnuk (a little bit scary) - Mr.Egg 04:12 pm UTC 10/22/07 |
| Mr Egg, I refrained my very strong instincts which tell me to respond to you as a smart ass--cuz I tend to be that way occasionally. I read some of your posts down this page and I can't figure out if you're imposter posting on us or what. I'll give the benefit of the doubt and assume that you're new and being genuine with us...but I'm having my doubts. Let me give you a little advice as someone who's been around here longer than you claim to have been anyway. If you have questions about exchanges that were posted in the past, please take a little MORE time to read them all through. Very few have been removed from the archives--you'll relive it just like we went through it--we had no more knowledge about conversations than what you're reading. Susan and Smeg had many heated exchanges between last April and September, their final ones landing them off the board. Most are still there, I'm sure. If you want to be accepted by this community, you'll go a long way if you quit posting past posts! You don't seem to understand that this has been a turbulent time for this community and we really want to discuss/read about Jim. Not Susan. I told you before, we're a gunshy lot and unfortunately newcomers aren't blindly welcomed as much as they once were. Especially when there are striking similarities between writing style and a banned trouble maker. You'd go a long way by introducing yourself and telling us something you. Please try to add NJC to your non-Steinman related posts--that helps other posters. But go back into the archives and you can answer most all of your questions yourself. Since you and Bright Eyes have hit it off so well, perhaps you could e-mail each other privately and BE can give you his/her take on whatever--you seem to believe BE, so what the hell. I'd keep an open mind, but the gist would all be pretty consistant I'd think. I'm just giving you some friendly advice here. Once this lot gets pissed off they're a little hard to turn around and if you're on the level and just naive, you don't deserve to have that happen to you. Leesa (another scary one) Johnson > Who is Smeghead and what did he do to deserve this? > > I understand that Pidnuk is the famous Susan. > > > Pidunk wrote: > > "Smeghead, you are the smartest person on the board, or of > many I have met in life. How do I know? Because you know > how to attack without leaving any margin to be countered, > and you know how to attack and attack, and attack, and > never give the other side anything to make you vulnerable > with. You are a true tyrant in every sense of the word, > and I hope I have never met you and hope never to meet > you. I would absolutely despise you thoroughly, and not > give you an inch of compassion if I found you on the > street bleeding. I would hope on you the things you hope > on me, in double and triple measure, and that is all there > would be. You are a total terrorist, in that you terrorize > on this board, with and without the support of your > cohorts who abide by you, and your avatar is a signature > that you use to show your power, it is a power of > darkness, of hate, of filthy putrid hate, that has no > place in any humanistic place such as Jim's domain is. Why > are you here? You studied him for hating him, and you are > nice because you have charm but you are evil behind your > smile and humor. Nothing but evil, and you would be on my > first list of any list I would write for people to seek > out in the event of mine or anyone elses' demise in my > sphere. You are a rotting spoiled pile of dung. > Goodnight." > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Pidnuk (a little bit scary) - Mr.Egg 04:12 pm UTC 10/22/07 |
| Next: | re: Pidnuk (a little bit scary) - Mr.Egg 04:53 pm UTC 10/22/07 |
| Thread: | |