| re: Sister (Andrew Eldritch) - Quote | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 01:42 pm UTC 01/10/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Sister (Andrew Eldritch) - Quote - Pudding 02:56 am UTC 01/10/08 |
| Had I read that post first, yes. I probably shouldn't have posted at all, really. Clearly your post was inherently an expression of your personal taste. God knows how many flame wars have been started over this sort of thing. A lapse in judgment on my part. Peace and good sex be with you. > Had you read this post first > http://jimsteinman.com/messageboard/d.php?id=19313 in > response to Markus, you'd have seen that I corrected > myself by saying "That's true, so from my own personal > taste, nearly everything they've ever put to album, apart > from the Steinman stuff is crap" > > So you can clearly see that I changed from generalising my > statement to personalising it. > > > Subjective irony, clearly. Based on the two (2) SoM > > albums I own (thank you Moco Beth Steinman, wherever you > > are), your assertion doesn't stand up to the harsh light > > of somebody else's perspective. > > > > > > Because (unlike most bands) we do not believe in putting > > > > out an album with only two good songs on it. > > > > > > Anyone else see the irony in that statement? Sisters Of > > > Mercy have only ever released albums with about 2 (at > > > most) half decent songs on them. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Sister (Andrew Eldritch) - Quote - Pudding 02:56 am UTC 01/10/08 |
| Next: | re: Sister (Andrew Eldritch) - Quote - Markus 12:18 am UTC 01/08/08 |
| Thread: | |