| re: break it! | |
|
Posted by: |
second_eagle 10:46 pm UTC 01/15/08 |
| In reply to: | re: break it! - Marvello 10:29 pm UTC 01/15/08 |
| Well, I sort of agree with both. (Guess I'm a bit wishy washy then, eh?) I vote for WH guitar and drums, at TMIL tempo, and maybe a better vocalist? > I think the WH orchestration carries more of the emotion > of the song, the anger. TMIL just dumbs it down. > > > What I like about the WH version, is that it's just an > > unpretentious, loud, short, no nonsense ditty, that sticks > > the heavy in your face, and keeps it there for the two > > minutes that the song lasts. Or something along those > > lines. > > > > In comparison, the Bat III version is an overlong, > > pretentious piece of ostrich-poo. It needs half a minute > > to get going, the arrangement is too full — brass just > > does not belong in something that tries to be heavy metal > > — the break down and the solo are nothing special... meh. > > > > > > > > > compared to the WH version it > > > definitely sounds better. the production is just much > > > more...voluminous and powerful, where WH is just loud. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: break it! - Smeghead 12:19 pm UTC 01/16/08 |
| Next: | re: break it! - SeeingI 04:57 am UTC 01/25/08 |
| Thread: |
|