So the 'We took it down' is an incorrect statement then? because by all accounts, there is no 'We' about it.
> Jim's blogs are by Jim. It's silly to even suggest
> otherwise.
>
> > I'm guessing by that statement that we won't be getting
> > many, if any, more Jim blogs. And if we do, there's no
> > guarantee that it's actually from Jim.
> >
> > > We took it down because some of the information is no
> > > longer valid and the press consults the blog as a source.
> > > Up to date information will be issued by the producers as
> > > they see fit to release it.
> > >
> > > xxx
> > > JD
> > >
> > > > Is it just my computer, or has Jim's entry about The
> > > > Musical (where he says it's a possibility for the Apollo
> > > > Victoria, and Wilson Milam isn't involved etc.) vanished?
> > > >
|
