Bad For Good kicks ass on it's own merit.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda. I like Jim's vocals. Vocal talent aside, his voice has a raw power to it, a resolve of sorts. It should. It's his album, he wrote it. He means what he sings and doesn't need some other performer to interpret it. In hindsight, i'm glad he didn't make another. He has his sole standing masterpiece. You know a true fan when they whip out a Bad For Good album, not a 3rd reissue of Bat Out Of Hell...and stuff.
> Bad for good had been more successful. Its something I
> often think about late at night. I think it would have
> only been good. Granted. Bad for good is reheated Bat out
> of hell left overs. (Sorry Jim if you read this, I love
> you man and I love BFG. But its rehash of the Bat formula
> and not one of the songs on BFG is as strong as a Bat
> song). Would we have had a series of Jim sung albums.
> Would we have had all the legal trouble with Meat? Would
> we have ever heard TEOTH? Would Never Land be a multi
> million-dollar film right now? Who knows, would like Jims
> view as well of possible (Hint hint JD) OR he could always
> use that good old-fashioned blog of his. But I expect its
> over used with the constant DE updates were getting.
|
