I love Jim singing. According to the interview on Smeg’s site. Jim was planning to go back on tour with TNE. Imagine, Meat singing 2 out of 3 and then Jim taking lead vocals on frying pan or stark raving love. However, I can’t imagine Meat just sitting there and letting Jim take centre stage. Don’t know who caught 3 bats on TMF the other week but during AFL (At which point I was swearing at the T.V. cause of the shit vocals from Meat) Aspen (Saved the performance BTW) held a really long note and Meat did exactly the same to try and out stage her. It was probably planned but he still pisses me of when he dose that
> Bad For Good reached #7 in the UK in 1981 and the highest
> for Bat Out Of Hell was #9, so it was relatively
> successful. Personally I don't rate Jim's singing much, so
> I'm glad that there wasn't a series of Jim solo albums.
> Had Jims and Meats relationship not gone south, I think we
> would have had more Meat/Jim albums than we have. Saying
> that, had we had more Jim/Meat albums then we might not
> have had Bonnie or Pandora's Box.
>
> Swings and roundabouts.
>
> > Bad for good had been more successful. Its something I
> > often think about late at night. I think it would have
> > only been good. Granted. Bad for good is reheated Bat out
> > of hell left overs. (Sorry Jim if you read this, I love
> > you man and I love BFG. But its rehash of the Bat formula
> > and not one of the songs on BFG is as strong as a Bat
> > song). Would we have had a series of Jim sung albums.
> > Would we have had all the legal trouble with Meat? Would
> > we have ever heard TEOTH? Would Never Land be a multi
> > million-dollar film right now? Who knows, would like Jims
> > view as well of possible (Hint hint JD) OR he could always
> > use that good old-fashioned blog of his. But I expect its
> > over used with the constant DE updates were getting.
|
