HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim Steinman

Posted by:
Belmont 01:47 am UTC 02/03/08
In reply to: re: Jim Steinman - Pudding 10:09 pm UTC 02/02/08

I remember you saying it to some else. I know what that means. lol




> The LOL (Lots Of Laughs or Laughing Out Lout) at the end
> of the sentence should've been a clear indication that I
> was being sarcastic and having a bit of fun. Ah well, I'll
> try harder next time :o(
>
> There's some real touchy people on the board :o(
>
>
> > Jim has an extremely low profile. Its not like he has
> > movie star status (well, he could but I dont think he
> > really wants it). He was once described as "The Unknown
> > Super Star". Which he still is. I'm pretty sure you
> > already knew that to a certain exten because I HIGHLY
> > doubt your that stupid. Actually, I dont even think your
> > stupid. Just a bit irritating. I'll let you have your fun
> > though. I dont really care.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > He is also the most known unknown.
> > >
> > > What the fuck are you talking about? that makes no sense
> > > whatsoever....LOL
> > >
> > > Jim's my favourite songwriter, not sure he's the best EVER
> > > though.


reply |

Previous: re: Jim Steinman - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 07:15 pm UTC 02/06/08
Next: re: Jim Steinman - RadioMaster 06:53 pm UTC 02/02/08

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE