| re: Jim Steinman | |
|
Posted by: |
Belmont 01:47 am UTC 02/03/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim Steinman - Pudding 10:09 pm UTC 02/02/08 |
| I remember you saying it to some else. I know what that means. lol > The LOL (Lots Of Laughs or Laughing Out Lout) at the end > of the sentence should've been a clear indication that I > was being sarcastic and having a bit of fun. Ah well, I'll > try harder next time :o( > > There's some real touchy people on the board :o( > > > > Jim has an extremely low profile. Its not like he has > > movie star status (well, he could but I dont think he > > really wants it). He was once described as "The Unknown > > Super Star". Which he still is. I'm pretty sure you > > already knew that to a certain exten because I HIGHLY > > doubt your that stupid. Actually, I dont even think your > > stupid. Just a bit irritating. I'll let you have your fun > > though. I dont really care. > > > > > > > > > > He is also the most known unknown. > > > > > > What the fuck are you talking about? that makes no sense > > > whatsoever....LOL > > > > > > Jim's my favourite songwriter, not sure he's the best EVER > > > though. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim Steinman - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 07:15 pm UTC 02/06/08 |
| Next: | re: Jim Steinman - RadioMaster 06:53 pm UTC 02/02/08 |
| Thread: | |