| re: What's 'that'? | |
|
Posted by: |
Smeghead 04:54 pm UTC 02/08/08 |
| In reply to: | re: What's 'that'? - Willis 02:09 pm UTC 02/08/08 |
| It all comes down to the fact that so many people don't really listen to the words of songs the listen to. > I think you should do it. Set as many people straight as > possible. Remember to use small words to avoid > confusion. > > Play the verse once. Explain what won't be done. Play > the verse again. If those in the audience still don't > understand, repeat the previous steps. Then move onto the > next verse. > > It still is comical how, I'd venture to say, the majority > of the public still doesn't understand the song. > > I've known a few people over the years that think Anything > For Love is a stupid song, and it's always because they > don't get it. Although it really isn't that hard. > > > Over at the Dutch Meat Loaf forum, there's a request for > > someone to hold a (short) presentation at > > href="http://www.lost.nl/">Lost&Found (February 22, > > Amsterdam, NL) on the "myth around 'that'" in Anything for > > Love. > > > > At the moment, I'm contemplating if I should volunteer. > > Holding a presentation about something I'm supposedly an > > expert on for a group of 150 complete strangers who are > > apparently not the experts, while not my forte, is not > > something that scares me. > > > > If I were to hold such a presentation, what > > should be in it? I don't know what the time limit and > > other restrictions are, but what would be essential to > > cover, what should not be mentioned, general ideas, > > anything? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: What's 'that'? - Willis 02:09 pm UTC 02/08/08 |
| Next: | re: What's 'that'? - EvilNickname 03:29 pm UTC 02/08/08 |
| Thread: | |