| re: I have a serious "that" | |
|
Posted by: |
samurai7 04:16 pm UTC 02/12/08 |
| In reply to: | re: I have a serious "that" - Pudding 08:52 am UTC 02/12/08 |
| hey Pud, are you Holding Out For A Hero? :-p be careful - we might end up reigniting the 'is Jim gay' conversation all over again ;o) > Homosexuals have stolen every other Jim song and turned it > into a gay anthem, so why not. > > I'm Gonna Love Her For Both Of Us could be a lesbian > song. > > > Even though we all know that we're told what the "that" is > > over and over...I can add a serious mystery "that"...one > > I've long thought would fit. > > > > I won't do that = I won't go back to my homosexual > > liefstyle. > > > > I can see this song being by a gay guy that has fallen > > deeply for a woman who fears that one day she'll loose him > > to true sexual orientation. > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: I have a serious "that" - Pudding 08:52 am UTC 02/12/08 |
| Next: | re: Let's do some myth-building - Pudding 01:42 am UTC 02/12/08 |
| Thread: | |