| re: Bat Concept Album |
|
Posted by:
 |
Marvello 02:47 pm UTC 04/12/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: Bat Concept Album - Pudding 10:42 pm UTC 04/11/08 |
|
To deep.
> Isn't the very definition of faith the firm belief in
> something for which there is no proof? Perhaps Smegs faith
> is overshadowed by reality or perhaps our reality is
> overshadowed by unrealistic blind faith?
>
> I've had a couple of beers.
>
> > Smeg... not to be rude... or perhaps exactly because of
> > that... but if you have so little faith in the man and his
> > fans, why bother calling yourself a fan and hang around
> > here?
> >
> > K.
> >
> >
> > > HAHAHAHA! So true. Really, all the songs Jim is
> > > shoehorning into the Neverland story because he can't
> > > write new material shouldn't be in the show.
> > >
> > > > Agreed. To put Objects in the show would make Tanz a
> > > > mockery.
> > > >
> > > > > Objects should not be in the show.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Bruce Springsteen - Objects (live)
> > > > >
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Bat Concept Album - Pudding 10:42 pm UTC 04/11/08 |
| Next: |
re: Bat Concept Album - Pudding 07:59 am UTC 04/14/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|