| re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? |
|
Posted by:
 |
Smeghead 11:44 am UTC 04/15/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - Pudding 07:38 am UTC 04/15/08 |
|
So true. Bat 2 might have taken forever... but I still listen to it. I NEVER put on TMIL. Just as I would rather have Jim do something that relatively few people buy such as Pandora's Box than have him work with some big name star like Celine... since I still listen to PB but never torture myself with Celine. Sure the masses may not get to know another Jim song... but I'll be selfish and prefer Top quality for myself.
> I'd have waited rather than have what we ended up with.
>
> > We'd also probably still be waiting for it!
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - Pudding 07:38 am UTC 04/15/08 |
| Next: |
re: Jim's involvement in Bat 3? - Jsteinfan 01:27 pm UTC 04/14/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|