| re: An example of this Neverland thing/argument | |
|
Posted by: |
Jsteinfan 02:26 pm UTC 05/01/08 |
| In reply to: | re: An example of this Neverland thing/argument - Smeghead 10:20 pm UTC 04/30/08 |
>Because otherwise, Unlike Rent and West > Side Story it will simply be seen as a Meat Loaf Jukebox > musical. That's a given! So you'd rather see it as a Meat Loaf Jukebox Musical based on Peter Pan???? I don't see how that helps things. Jim has to milk Bat Out Hell on this. Musical based on the chart topping rock franchise. or Successful rock franchise has on-stage debut! etc... Like it or not, Meat Loaf is part of Bat Out Of Hell. Appearance doens't = reality. Despite his size he's not the larger part! They don't make condoms for elephants | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: An example of this Neverland thing/argument - Smeghead 10:20 pm UTC 04/30/08 |
| Next: | re: An example of this Neverland thing/argument - Pudding 08:26 pm UTC 05/01/08 |
| Thread: |
|