not logged in
| re: Jim would be nothing with Meat | |
Posted by:  |
Smeghead 11:29 am UTC 05/26/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - batoutofhell77 07:41 am UTC 05/26/08 |
| Jim has shown he can make successful songs without Meat. All of Bat's songs could have been hits with other artists. If Jim hadn't given them to Meat. Jim had a top ten single with himself singing as well. And Meat has a SUCCESSFUL acting career? What movie or TV show has he starred in that's a hit? Fight Club? not the star... Rocky Horror... Not the star... I have nothing against him as an actor. He's allright, but not a success. As a singer... he's washed up and all his hits were with with Jim in control and at least 15 years ago. All evidence is that Meat hasn't got the chops to help Jim "go out with a bang". And Jim has shown he can have a successful stage show without Meat. The Jukenox musicals (which BOOH isn't but everyone will think it is) have never starred their original artists... Jim can have a successful show with a good director and star... as in Polanski/Barton and not a mess like Rando/Mikey Boy. > Jim has had most success with Meat then anybody > else.....Yes he has had hits with other artists 2 with > bonnie, 1 with Air Supply and 1 eith Celine and i wont > count Boyzone b/c that never made it to the U.S. I believe > lets see what hits he had with Meat Loaf - The entire Bat > 1 album, some of Bat 2 not ill list the songs Meat Loaf > made famous for Jim > > Anything for Love > Paradise > Bat > 2 outta 3 > You took the owrds > Rock N Roll Dreams > Objects > > SO in my opinion, yes Jim has only had what? 5 songs top > that have had success without Meat Loafs vocals, im n ot > bashing Jim but u guys just tear Meat apart and thik Jim > would have done just as well without Meat, well no offense > he wouldnt of, just like Meat wouldnt of done as well > without Jim. > > Lets look at Meats side now > > HEs had an acting career for over 30 + years and singing, > he does movies not just singing, people actually KNOW his > name and can point him out when hearing him sing. Just > face it both men need each other to go out with a bang.... > i just wish u guys would get over the Bat 3 problem, i > believe Jim has, so stop trying to kiss ass and dont get > so offended when someone tlks well of MEat, and the same > for Jim.....Im not bashing either men, i just brought both > their flaws to the table and hopefully during this reall > long post it made some sense! > > > Hmm, if the big guy fails to deliver good vocals on this > > current tour i reckon he'll be all washed up. > > > > How is he gonna take to a West End stage singing night > > after night, maybe even matinee performances, when he > > can't even complete a short tour without his voice turning > > to shit. > > > > The demands of a show will far exceed his abilities now, > > for fucks sake he's only 4 years from a bus pass. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - Tremorlor 01:16 pm UTC 05/26/08 |
| Next: | re: Jim would be nothing with Meat - daveake 10:36 am UTC 05/26/08 |
| Thread: | |